As the world grapples with the existential threat of climate change, it’s hard not to wonder: are we making progress towards a safer, more sustainable future? The Paris Agreement, signed in 2015, was seen as a major breakthrough in international cooperation on climate action. But six years on, how have we fared in translating that promise into reality?
On the surface, the numbers look encouraging. Last year, the United Nations reported that 186 countries had submitted new or updated national climate action plans, known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). These plans outline countries’ emissions reduction targets and strategies for achieving them. But scratch beneath the surface, and the picture becomes more complex.
One of the key challenges in assessing progress is the lack of a common metric for measuring success. Different countries have varying levels of ambition, and NDCs are only as strong as the policies and implementation plans that underpin them. A recent study by the Climate Action Tracker found that while some countries, like Costa Rica and Norway, have set themselves on a path to meet the Paris Agreement’s temperature goals, others, like the United States and Australia, are on track to exceed their allowed carbon budgets.
Learn more: The Unsung Hero of Renewable Energy: Pumped Hydro Storage
This variation in ambition and progress is partly due to the voluntary nature of the Paris Agreement. Unlike some international agreements, it doesn’t have a binding mechanism for countries to meet their commitments. Instead, it relies on peer pressure, reputation, and economic incentives to drive action.
Despite these challenges, there are reasons to be optimistic. The European Union, for example, has made significant strides in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and investing in renewable energy. China, the world’s largest emitter, has committed to peaking its carbon emissions by 2030 and has made progress in transitioning to cleaner energy sources.
The COVID-19 pandemic has also accelerated the pace of climate action in some countries. Governments have responded to the crisis by investing in green infrastructure, promoting remote work, and encouraging sustainable behaviors. These efforts have helped to reduce emissions in some sectors, such as transportation and industry.
However, the pace of progress remains too slow to meet the scale and urgency of the climate crisis. The IPCC’s 1.5°C report, published in 2018, warned that global emissions need to be cut by 45% by 2030 to have any chance of limiting warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. Current NDCs, on the other hand, would lead to a 3.2°C increase, far exceeding the recommended limit.
So what’s holding us back? Part of the answer lies in the economics of climate action. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy requires significant investment in new infrastructure, technologies, and skills. But it also creates opportunities for growth, job creation, and improved public health.
The other challenge is politics. Climate change is a global problem that requires cooperation and collective action. But it’s also a contentious issue, with different countries and interest groups holding varying views on the pace and scope of action needed.
This is where the importance of building public support and mobilizing civil society comes in. Climate activism has grown exponentially over the past decade, with movements like Fridays for Future and Extinction Rebellion bringing attention to the issue and pushing governments to take action.
As we look to the future, it’s clear that the progress made so far is just a starting point. The next decade will be crucial in determining whether we can collectively take the necessary steps to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. Will we find the common ground needed to overcome our differences and work towards a more sustainable future? Only time will tell.
