As the world continues to transition towards renewable energy sources, one technology has been hailed as a game-changer: pumped hydro storage (PHS). This behemoth of energy infrastructure has been touted as a vital component in the quest for a carbon-neutral future, capable of storing excess energy generated by solar and wind power for later use. But is this really the case, or is PHS a shadow of its former self?
Learn more: Why Vertical Axis Wind Turbines Might Just Change the Way We Think About Wind Power
While it’s true that PHS is a tried-and-true technology with a proven track record, a closer look at its environmental impact reveals a more nuanced picture. For starters, the construction of PHS facilities requires massive amounts of concrete and steel, not exactly the most eco-friendly materials. In fact, a single PHS project can generate up to 2 million tons of CO2 emissions, equivalent to the annual emissions of 400,000 cars.
But that’s not all. The sheer size of PHS facilities – often spanning hundreds of acres – can also lead to the destruction of natural habitats and ecosystems. In the United States alone, it’s estimated that the construction of PHS facilities has displaced over 1,000 acres of old-growth forests and wetlands. And let’s not forget the water usage: PHS requires a constant supply of water, which can strain local aquifers and impact downstream ecosystems.
Learn more: The Fury of the Sun: Unpacking the Power and Perils of Solar Flares
So, what’s behind the greenwashing of PHS? In part, it’s due to the fact that PHS is often seen as a “baseload” energy source, capable of providing a constant flow of power to the grid. But this narrative ignores the reality of how PHS actually works. In reality, PHS is only able to store energy for short periods of time – typically between 4-12 hours – making it woefully inadequate for addressing the intermittency of solar and wind power.
This doesn’t mean that PHS has no role to play in the transition to renewable energy. However, it’s time to rethink our assumptions about this technology and its place in the energy mix. Rather than relying solely on PHS, we should be exploring alternative energy storage solutions that are more sustainable, more efficient, and more environmentally friendly.
Take, for example, the emerging field of flow batteries. These innovative technologies use liquid electrolytes to store energy, eliminating the need for massive amounts of concrete and steel. And because flow batteries can be scaled up or down to meet energy demand, they offer a level of flexibility that PHS simply can’t match.
It’s time to confront the reality of PHS and its limitations. While it may seem like a convenient solution for addressing the intermittency of renewable energy, the truth is that this technology has a dark side. By acknowledging its environmental impact and exploring alternative energy storage solutions, we can create a more sustainable and equitable energy future for all.
