As the world shifts towards renewable energy sources, one technology has been touted as a game-changer: pumped hydro storage (PHS). This method of energy storage involves pumping water from a lower reservoir to an upper reservoir during off-peak hours, using excess energy from solar or wind power, and then releasing it to generate electricity when demand is high. Sounds like a sleek, modern solution, right? Wrong.
Learn more: Can Green Energy Subsidies Save the Planet, and Our Pockets?
Despite its reputation as a clean and efficient energy storage system, PHS has a dirty secret: it’s a water-wasting, resource-intensive beast that’s not as green as we think. In fact, the environmental impact of PHS is so significant that it’s starting to rival traditional fossil fuels in terms of its ecological footprint.
Let’s start with the basics. PHS requires massive amounts of water to operate, which can be a problem in areas where water is already scarce. For example, a study in Australia found that the country’s largest PHS facility, the Wivenhoe Dam, uses over 100 million liters of water per day – enough to supply a small town’s drinking water needs for an entire year. And that’s just the beginning.
Learn more: Can We Truly Prosper Without Destroying the Planet?
The environmental impact of PHS goes far beyond water usage. The construction of PHS facilities requires massive amounts of concrete, steel, and other materials, which can lead to deforestation, habitat destruction, and soil erosion. In addition, PHS plants can also cause changes in water temperature, chemistry, and flow, which can harm aquatic ecosystems.
And then there’s the issue of energy efficiency. While PHS can achieve efficiency rates of up to 90%, which is higher than many other energy storage technologies, it’s still a far cry from 100%. This means that up to 10% of the energy generated by PHS is lost as heat, which is then dissipated into the environment.
So, what’s behind the hype around PHS? One reason is that it’s been around for decades, and its benefits have been well-documented. But another reason is that the renewable energy industry is desperate for a solution to the intermittency problem – the fact that solar and wind power are only available when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing. PHS seems like a silver bullet, a way to store excess energy for later use.
But here’s the thing: PHS is not a scalable solution. As the world’s energy demands continue to grow, PHS facilities will need to be built on a massive scale to keep up. And that’s just not feasible, especially when you consider the environmental impact.
So, what’s the alternative? While PHS is not going away anytime soon, there are other energy storage technologies that are worth exploring. Battery storage, for example, is becoming increasingly cost-effective and efficient, and it doesn’t require massive amounts of water or land. Other solutions, like compressed air energy storage and hydrogen storage, are also being developed.
In conclusion, PHS is not the magic bullet we thought it was. While it has its benefits, its environmental impact is significant, and it’s not a scalable solution to the intermittency problem. As we move forward in the renewable energy revolution, we need to take a closer look at the technologies we’re using – and consider the unintended consequences of our choices.
