As the world struggles to come to terms with the devastating effects of climate change, a haunting question lingers: what if our efforts to mitigate its impact are too little, too late? The Paris Agreement, signed by nearly 200 countries in 2015, aimed to limit global warming to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. But with the latest IPCC report warning that we’re on course for a catastrophic 3.2°C rise, one can’t help but wonder: are we making progress towards a climate treaty that will actually save us?
Learn more: Sowing Seeds of Sustainability: The Rise of Eco-Development Plans
The answer lies in the numbers. Since the Paris Agreement, greenhouse gas emissions have continued to rise, albeit at a slower pace. Renewable energy production has increased significantly, with solar and wind power becoming increasingly cost-competitive with fossil fuels. Electric vehicles are gaining traction, and many countries have set ambitious targets to phase out coal and reduce carbon emissions. These developments are undoubtedly positive, but the question remains: are they enough?
One of the key areas of progress has been in international cooperation. The Paris Agreement has spawned a plethora of national climate plans, known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), which outline each country’s emissions reduction targets. While these plans are voluntary, they’ve helped to create a sense of global momentum and coordination. The agreement has also established a framework for regular review and ratcheting up of ambition, with countries expected to submit updated NDCs every five years.
Learn more: Breaking Free from the Energy Grind: Why Energy Independence Matters Now More Than Ever
However, the reality is that these efforts are still woefully inadequate. According to the IPCC, the current NDCs put us on track for a catastrophic 3.2°C rise, which would have devastating consequences for vulnerable communities, economies, and ecosystems. Moreover, the agreement’s reliance on voluntary commitments has led to criticism that it’s too weak, too vague, and too focused on the interests of developed countries.
So, where do we go from here? The answer lies in a combination of increased ambition, technological innovation, and bold policy changes. Governments, corporations, and civil society must come together to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy, driven by clean energy, sustainable land use, and climate-resilient infrastructure. The good news is that there are already signs of progress in these areas.
Take, for example, the rapidly growing market for electric vehicles. As battery costs continue to plummet, EVs are becoming increasingly competitive with internal combustion engines. This has sparked a wave of investment in EV infrastructure, with countries like Norway and the Netherlands leading the charge. Similarly, the cost of renewable energy is falling fast, making it more viable for countries to transition away from fossil fuels.
But even as these positive trends emerge, the climate crisis remains a pressing concern. The window for action is rapidly closing, and the science is clear: we need to halve global emissions by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2050 to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The question is: can we still get there?
The answer will depend on our collective will to act. Will we continue to prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability? Or will we summon the courage to transform our societies, economies, and politics to ensure a livable future for all?
The progress of the climate treaty is a story of both hope and despair. While there are many reasons to be optimistic, the reality is that we’re still far from where we need to be. The question is not whether we can still save ourselves, but whether we’re willing to try. The clock is ticking, and the answer lies in our hands.
